Table of Contents

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ Definitive Additional Materials

☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.

​

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

​

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (check all boxes that apply):

☒ No fee required.

☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

​

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

3535 Harbor Boulevard, Suite 100

Costa Mesa, CA 92626

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 7, 2022

Dear Stockholders of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.:

The 2022 annual meeting of stockholders of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company”), will be held virtually via audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LOCO2022 on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time to consider and vote on the following proposals:

You will be able to participate online and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LOCO2022. You will also be able to vote electronically at the annual meeting. Details regarding how to participate in the meeting online and the business to be conducted at the annual meeting are more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on June 7, 2022: This Notice, the proxy statement, and the 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.  These materials are also available on our website at http://investor.elpolloloco.com.

Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on April 8, 2022, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. Only stockholders of record will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, with each share entitling its owner to one vote on each matter properly presented. A list of stockholders as of the record date may be accessed during the virtual annual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LOCO2022 by using the control number included with the proxy materials you received for the meeting.

Table of Contents

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. We hope that you will attend the annual meeting. Whether or not you do, please vote in advance online, by telephone, or by mail.

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

3535 Harbor Boulevard, Suite 100

Costa Mesa, CA 92626

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

This proxy statement provides information for stockholders of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Company and its board of directors (the “Board”) from holders of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, for use at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time, on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

At the annual meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote either directly or by proxy on the following matters discussed herein:

The Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement, form of proxy, and our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report") are being distributed to stockholders on or about April 28, 2022. These materials are also available on our website at http://investor.elpolloloco.com.

In accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report, to stockholders over the internet. Accordingly, we are mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders that did not request paper copies of our proxy materials and Annual Report or are otherwise receiving the proxy materials electronically by email, while brokers, banks and other nominees who hold shares on behalf of beneficial owners will be sending their own similar Notice to the beneficial owners. The Notice contains instructions on how stockholders can access our proxy materials over the internet and vote their shares over the internet, via phone, or by mail. If you receive a Notice, you will not receive printed copies of our proxy materials unless you specifically request them.

​

Table of Contents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS

AND THE ANNUAL MEETING

Although we encourage you to read this proxy statement in its entirety, we include this Q&A section to provide some background information and brief answers to several questions you might have about the annual meeting.

Q:Why are we providing these materials?

A:These materials are provided to you in connection with our annual meeting, which will take place on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time. Stockholders are invited to participate in the annual meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described herein.

Q:What proposals will be voted on at the annual meeting?

A:There are three proposals scheduled to be voted on at the annual meeting:

We will also consider any other business that properly comes before the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Q:How does the Board recommend that I vote?

A:The Board recommends that you vote your shares:

Q:Can I attend the annual meeting?

A:We will be hosting the annual meeting live via the internet. You will not be able to attend the annual meeting in person. Any stockholder can listen to and participate in the annual meeting live via the internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LOCO2022. Our Board annually considers the appropriate format of our annual meeting. Our virtual annual meeting allows stockholders to submit questions during the 15 minutes before the meeting and during the meeting. After the meeting, we will spend up to 15 minutes answering stockholder questions that comply with the meeting rules of conduct; the rules of conduct will be posted on the virtual meeting web portal. To the extent time doesn’t allow us to answer all of the appropriately submitted questions, we will answer them in writing on our investor relations website, at https://investor.elpolloloco.com, soon after the meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions, we will group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition.

The annual meeting webcast will begin promptly at 1:00 p.m., Pacific Time. We encourage you to access the annual meeting webcast prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin, and stockholders may begin submitting written questions, at 12:45 p.m., Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.

Table of Contents

Q.What do I need in order to be able to participate in the annual meeting?

A:You will need the control number to be able to vote your shares or submit questions during the annual meeting. The control number is included on your Notice or your proxy card or voting instruction form if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials or included in the email to you if you received the proxy materials by email. Instructions on how to connect to the annual meeting and participate via the internet are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LOCO2022. If you do not have your control number, you will be able to access and listen to the annual meeting, but you will not be able to vote your shares or submit questions during the annual meeting.

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting or submitting questions. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting web portal.

Q.Why is the Company holding the annual meeting virtually?

A:We are embracing technology to provide expanded access, improved communication, reduced environmental impact and cost savings for our stockholders and the Company. Hosting a virtual meeting enables increased stockholder attendance and participation since stockholders can participate and ask questions from any location around the world, and it provides us an opportunity to give thoughtful responses. In addition, we intend that the virtual meeting format provide stockholders a similar level of transparency to the traditional in-person meeting format, and we take steps to ensure such an experience. Our stockholders will be afforded the same opportunities to participate at the virtual annual meeting as they would at an in-person annual meeting of stockholders.

Q:What shares can I vote?

A:You may vote all shares of common stock that you owned as of the close of business on the record date, April 8, 2022. You may cast one vote per share of common stock, including shares (i) held directly in your name as the stockholder of record and (ii) held in street name for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank, or other nominee. As of the record date, we had 36,743,864 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Q:How do I vote?

A:Stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote your shares at the annual meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LOCO2022 and using the control number on the Notice or proxy card. You may also vote in advance of the annual meeting by submitting a proxy over the internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice. If you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, you may vote your shares by completing, dating and signing the proxy card that was included with this proxy statement and promptly returning it in the pre-addressed, postage paid envelope provided to you, or by submitting a proxy over the internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you vote by internet or telephone, then you need not return a written proxy card by mail. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend that you vote in advance, in case you change your mind.

Beneficial owner. If you hold your shares of common stock in street name through a broker, bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee will allow you to deliver your voting instructions over the internet and may also permit you to vote by telephone. In addition, if you received a printed copy of this proxy statement, you may submit your voting instructions by completing, dating and signing the voting instruction form that was included with this proxy statement and promptly returning it in the pre-addressed, postage paid envelope provided to you. If you vote by internet or telephone, then you need not return a written voting instruction form by mail.

Q:What is the difference between being a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner?

A:As summarized below, there are some differences between being a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner.

Table of Contents

Stockholder of record: If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being made available directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the Company and to vote at the annual meeting.

Beneficial owner: If your shares are held through a broker, bank or other nominee, you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by the organization that holds your shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to tell your nominee how to vote, and you are also invited to attend the annual meeting. The broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares has sent you instructions on how to submit your voting instructions. You may vote by following those instructions and the instructions on the Notice.

Q:What is the deadline for voting my shares if I do not attend the annual meeting?

A:If you are a stockholder of record, your proxy must be received by telephone or the internet by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 6, 2022, for your shares to be voted at the annual meeting. If you are a stockholder of record and you received a printed set of proxy materials, you also have the option of completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card enclosed with the proxy materials before the annual meeting in order for your shares to be voted at the meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock, please comply with the deadlines included in the voting instructions provided by the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares.

Q:Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

A:Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you can change your proxy instructions at any time before the vote at the annual meeting, by:

If your shares are held in “street name,” you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to change or revoke your voting instructions.

Q:What constitutes a quorum?

A:The holders of a majority of our common stock issued and outstanding as of the record date, present in person (including through online participation) or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote, shall constitute a quorum. Votes withheld, abstentions, and broker non-votes (as described below) are counted as present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Q:What is a broker non-vote?

A:If you hold your shares of common stock in street name through a brokerage account and you do not submit voting instructions to your broker, your broker may generally vote your shares in its discretion on routine matters. However, a broker cannot vote shares held in street name on non-routine matters unless the broker receives voting instructions from the street name holder. Proposal 2 (ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022) is considered routine under applicable stock exchange rules, while each of the other proposals to be submitted for a vote of stockholders at the annual meeting is considered non-routine. Accordingly, if you hold your shares of common stock in street name through a brokerage account and you do not submit voting instructions to your broker, your broker may exercise its discretion to vote on Proposal 2 at the annual meeting, but your broker will not be permitted to vote your shares on any of the other proposals at the annual meeting. If your broker exercises this discretion, your shares will be counted as present for determining the presence of a quorum at the annual meeting and

Table of Contents

will be voted on Proposal 2 in the manner directed by your broker, but your shares will constitute “broker non-votes” on each of the other items at the annual meeting.

Q:What is a proxyholder?

A:We are designating Laurance Roberts, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Anne E. Jollay, our Corporate Secretary, to hold and vote all properly tendered proxies. If you have properly submitted a proxy and indicated how your shares are to be voted on each of the proposals, they will so vote. If you properly submitted a proxy and did not indicate how your shares are to be voted on one or more of the proposals, they will vote as the Board recommends on those proposals. While we do not expect any other business to come up for vote at the annual meeting, if it does, each properly tendered proxy gives the named proxies authority to vote your shares on those matters in their discretion.

Q:What vote is required to approve each proposal and how are votes counted?

A:Proposal 1. The election of directors requires a plurality vote of the shares of common stock present in person or represented at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. The four director nominees who receive the largest number of votes cast “for” will be elected as Class II directors. As a result, any shares not voted “for” a particular nominee (whether as a result of stockholder withholding or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

Other Items (Proposals 2 and 3). Approval of each of the other items to be submitted for a vote by stockholders at the annual meeting requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. For Proposal 2 (ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP, as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022), and Proposal 3 (advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers), shares voted “abstain” will have the same effect as a vote “against” the proposal. We do not expect any broker non-votes on Proposal 2, and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the outcome of Proposal 3.

Q:Who will count the votes at the annual meeting?

A:A representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has been appointed to be the inspector of elections, to count the votes at the meeting, to make a written report thereof, and to certify the result of the vote taken. We will announce preliminary voting results at the meeting and publish final voting results on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file with the SEC within four (4) business days after the end of the annual meeting.

Q:Who bears the cost of soliciting votes for the annual meeting?

A:We bear the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing, and distributing these proxy materials. The solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone, and by electronic communication by our directors, officers, and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for these solicitation activities. In addition, we may reimburse brokerages and other entities that represent beneficial owners for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners.

Q:How can I nominate a director or propose an action for next year’s annual meeting?

A:If a stockholder wishes to submit a nomination or proposal, which will not be included in the Company’s proxy materials, for consideration at next year’s annual meeting, a written notice of such nomination or proposal must be provided to the Corporate Secretary. In accordance with the advance notice provisions of our bylaws, the written notice must be delivered to, or mailed to and received at, our principal executive office (provided below) between February 7, 2023, and March 9, 2023 (i.e., 120 and 90 days before June 7, 2023, the anniversary of the preceding annual meeting). However, if next year’s annual meeting is not scheduled within 25 days of that anniversary (i.e., between May 13, 2023, and July 2, 2023), the notice must be received by the Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business on the 10^th day following the date on which notice of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever first occurs.

Table of Contents

To be in proper written form, a notice must provide certain information set forth in our bylaws, which were filed as Exhibit 3.2 within our Annual Report.

In addition, a stockholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees at the 2023 annual meeting must provide written notice to our Corporate Secretary setting forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), unless the required information has been provided in a preliminary or definitive proxy statement previously filed by the stockholders. Such written notice must be provided in accordance with Rule 14a-19 no later than April 8, 2023 (i.e., 60 calendar days before June 7, 2023, the anniversary of the preceding annual meeting). If we change the date of the 2023 annual meeting by more than 30 days from the date of this year’s annual meeting, your written notice must be received by the later of 60 days prior to the date of the 2023 annual meeting or the 10^th calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2023 annual meeting is first made. The notice requirement under Rule 14a-19 is in addition to the applicable notice requirements under our bylaws as noted above.

Q:How can I submit a stockholder proposal for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting?

A:For a stockholder proposal (other than a director nomination) to be included in the Company’s proxy materials for consideration at next year’s annual meeting, you must satisfy both substantive and procedural requirements set forth in Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, a federal securities regulation that addresses when a company must include a stockholder’s proposal in its proxy materials, including the proxy statement and proxy card.

For a stockholder proposal to be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for the 2023 annual meeting, it must be received at our corporate address (provided below) by December 29, 2022 (i.e., not less than 120 days before April 28, 2023, the anniversary of the date of the company’s proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting). However, if the date of our 2023 annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of our 2022 annual meeting (i.e., if it is not between May 8, 2023, and July 7, 2023), then the deadline is a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials.

Q:Can I recommend director candidates directly to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee?

A:Yes, you may recommend director candidates by writing to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board at the mailing or email address below. We will consider any recommended director candidates subject to Board needs and candidate qualifications. We recommend that you include information relevant for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to evaluate your recommendation, including (i) your and your candidate’s names and contact information, (ii) your candidate’s principal occupation or employment, and other biographical information similar to that provided herein for directors and officers, (iii) other information of the sort required to be in a notice of nomination under our bylaws as discussed above, and (iv) a written consent by the candidate to your nomination. Stockholders recommending candidates for consideration by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in connection with the next annual meeting of stockholders should submit their written recommendation no later than January 1 of the year of that meeting.

Q:Can I communicate with the Board?

A:Yes, any stockholder or other interested party may write to the Board at our address below, on our investor relations website at https://investor.elpolloloco.com/ under “Contact the Board” or via email at legal@elpolloloco.com. Any interested parties desiring to communicate with the Audit Chairperson and other non-management directors may contact such directors by mailing communications to the same address below, but it must be directed to the attention of the Chairperson of the Audit Committee c/o the Corporate Secretary. Communications will be handled in accordance with the procedures explained on our website. The Board has instructed the Corporate Secretary to forward such correspondence to the intended recipients; however, the Board has also instructed the Corporate Secretary, prior to forwarding any correspondence, to review such correspondence and not forward any items deemed to be of a purely commercial or frivolous nature (such as spam) or otherwise obviously inappropriate for the intended recipient’s consideration. In such

Table of Contents

cases, the Corporate Secretary may forward some of the correspondence elsewhere within our company for review and possible response.

Q:What is your corporate address for notice and Board communication purposes?

Attention: Corporate Secretary

3535 Harbor Boulevard, Suite 100

Costa Mesa, CA 92626

(714) 599-5000

Q:What should I do if my household receives one copy of proxy materials and I need an additional copy?

A:The Company has adopted a procedure called "householding," which is approved by the SEC and permits the delivery of a single copy of the proxy materials, including the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this proxy statement and the Annual Report, to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions from a stockholder. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to access and receive a separate Notice or proxy card, as applicable. If your household received a single set of proxy materials this year, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, or if you are eligible for householding, but you and other stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of the proxy materials and you wish to receive only a single copy of each of these documents for your household, please contact Broadridge Householding Department, by calling their toll free number, 1-866-540-7095 or by writing to: Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. In the case of a request for your own copy of the proxy materials, you will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of your instructions, at which time you will then be sent separate copies of the documents.

​

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our business operates under the direction of our Board, which currently consists of eleven directors. Our certificate of incorporation divides our Board into three classes, Classes I, II, and III, with terms expiring in 2024, 2022, and 2023, respectively. Our Board has nominated, and stockholders are being asked to elect, our Class II directors, Nancy Faginas-Cody, Douglas J. Babb, William R. Floyd and Dean C. Kehler, each for a three-year term expiring at the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders. If elected, the nominees will each hold office until their respective successor is duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation, or removal.

The four Class II director nominees have consented to be named in this proxy statement and to serve as directors if elected. If any nominee of the Board is unable to serve, or for good cause will not serve, as a director at the time of the annual meeting, the persons who are designated as proxies intend to vote, in their discretion, for any other persons that may be designated by the Board. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board has no reason to believe that any of the director nominees named above will be unable to serve, or for good cause will not serve, as a director if elected.

Other than Ms. Faginas-Cody, each of our director nominees was previously elected to serve on our Board of Directors by our stockholders. Ms. Faginas-Cody was appointed to the Board in December 2021 and was initially identified as a potential director candidate by a third-party search firm.

You may vote “FOR ALL,” of the nominees, “WITHHOLD” your vote from all of the nominees or “WITHHOLD” your vote from any one of the nominees. The directors are elected by a plurality of the votes of common stock cast at the annual meeting. “Plurality” means that the four individuals who receive the largest number of votes “FOR” are elected as Class II directors. As a result, any shares not voted “FOR” a particular nominee (whether as a result of stockholder withholding or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR ALL” the Class II director nominees to be elected to the Board.

​

Table of Contents

INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Director Biographies

The following is biographical information about our Board of Directors, including a description of the experience, qualifications and skills that have led the Board to determine that each director should serve on the Board. The age of each director is as of April 28, 2022.

​

Michael G. Maselli has been Chairperson of our Board since 2011. Mr. Maselli is a managing director of Trimaran Fund Management, L.L.C. ("Trimaran Fund"), a position he has held since 2006, and is also currently the President of Acquisitions of GX Acquisition Corp. II. Before joining Trimaran Fund in February 2006, Mr. Maselli worked in the Corporate and Leverage Finance Groups of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ("CIBC") World Markets. Prior to joining CIBC in 1997, Mr. Maselli served as a Managing Director in Bear Stearns’ corporate finance group and, prior to that, as a Vice President at Kidder Peabody & Co. Incorporated. Mr. Maselli served on the board of ChanceLight, Inc. (f/k/a Educational Services of America, Inc.) until 2018. From 2013 to 2015, he served on the board of directors of Norcraft Companies, Inc., and also served on the board of managers of its predecessor company beginning in 2003. Additionally, Mr. Maselli served on the board of directors of Standard Steel, LLC, and was director as well as Chairman of the Board of CB Holding Corp. Mr. Maselli received an MBA with distinction from The A.B. Freeman School at Tulane University and a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Colorado. With his extensive background in banking, finance, and private equity, his supervisory and investment experience in a variety of industries, and his knowledge of us and our affiliates, Mr. Maselli is well-qualified to serve as our Chairperson.

Laurance Roberts has served as a director and as our President, Chief Executive Officer, and Interim Chief Financial Officer since March 2022. Previously, he was our interim Chief Executive Officer from October 2021 to March 2022 and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from July 2013 to March 2022. From 2008 to 2012 he was Chief Operating Officer for KFC, a major fried chicken restaurant chain and a division of Yum Brands. In 2008, he was also General Manager for KFC Restaurant Operating Company. Prior to that that, he spent three years as Chief Financial Officer of KFC, and three years as Chief Financial Officer of Yum Brands’ Pizza Hut joint venture in the United Kingdom. Mr. Roberts holds an MBA from the University of Michigan and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Bucknell University. In light of his leadership as our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer and his deep and detailed knowledge of our business and the industry, Mr. Roberts is well-qualified to serve on our Board.

Douglas J. Babb has been a director since 2018. From 2007 until 2014, he was Chief Executive Officer of Cooper Clinic, P.A. ("Cooper"), one of the largest multi-specialty, physician-owned clinics in the Arkansas region. Since his retirement as Chief Executive Officer, he has served as an adviser to the board of Cooper. Additionally, from 2010 to 2014, he served

Table of Contents

as an Adjunct Instructor for the College of Business at the University of Arkansas - Fort Smith. From 2015 to 2017, he served as Managing Director for Babb Strategic Services, L.L.P. (“Babb Strategic”), a consulting and strategic planning services company that he formed in 2006. Prior to forming Babb Strategic, he served as Executive Vice President - Chief Administrative and Legal Officer, and Secretary of Beverly Enterprises, Inc., a leading provider of healthcare services to the elderly in the United States, from 2000 to 2006. Prior to that he served in various senior executive roles at Burlington Northern, Inc., a diversified transportation company and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, from 1978 to 1999 and as Staff Counsel for the South Carolina Attorney General’s Office from 1977 to 1978. Mr. Babb is also the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the United States Marshals Museum and Chairman of the Board of Directors for the University of Arkansas - Fort Smith Foundation. He holds a bachelor’s degree from Minnesota State University and a J.D. from University of South Carolina. Mr. Babb is well-qualified to serve on our Board on account of his extensive experience, in particular the successful turnaround of Beverly Enterprises.

Samuel N. Borgese has been a director since 2011, and he served as Chairman of our Board from January 2011 to December 2011, while he also served as our Executive Chairman. Samuel N. Borgese is the Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Gather Holdings, LLC the equity owner of Shari’s CP, LLC and Shari’s Management Corporation.  Since 2017, Mr. Borgese has been President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Shari’s Management Corporation and Shari’s Restaurant Group, a multi-location family dining company. Since 2011, Mr. Borgese has been Managing Partner of Aceneca, LLC, a restaurant investment and consulting firm focused on creating shared value in the restaurant and other business sectors. From October 2014 to August 2016, he was President and Chief Executive Officer, and a member of the board of directors, of LRI Holdings, Inc., and its affiliates Logan’s Roadhouse, Inc., and Roadhouse Holding Inc., collectively known as Logan’s Roadhouse, a casual dining steakhouse chain. In August 2016, the Logan’s Roadhouse entities and various of their affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Mr. Borgese left Logan’s Roadhouse in August 2016, following the declaration of bankruptcy. From 2011 to 2014, he was Chief Executive Officer of Max Brenner International, a global chocolatier. From 2008 to 2011, he was first Interim President and Chief Executive Officer and then permanent President and Chief Executive Officer of CB Holding Corp., the parent of Charlie Brown’s Steakhouse and other chains, which was owned by Trimaran Capital Partners. From 2003 to 2008, he was employed by Catalina Restaurant Group, first as Chief Development Officer and later as President and Chief Executive Officer. Before that, Mr. Borgese was Chief Executive Officer of Bay Logics, Inc. an enterprise software company that supported 300 restaurant, retail, hospitality and general services businesses in the lifecycle management of their real estate assets. Mr. Borgese attended Temple University’s Architecture and Engineering school and holds a Certificate of Director Education from the National Association of Corporate Directors and a Certification of Completion of Harvard Business School Executive Education Program, CSV Program. With more than 30 years of senior executive and other leadership positions with public and private companies in the retail, technology, restaurant and hospitality sectors, Mr. Borgese is well qualified to serve on our Board.

Mark Buller has been a director since 2015. He was appointed Executive Chairman of Superior Cabinets in July 2018 and from 2013 to 2015, Mr. Buller was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Companies, Inc., a leading manufacturer of kitchen and bathroom cabinetry in the United States and Canada. Beginning in 2003, Mr. Buller was the Chief Executive Officer of the predecessor of Norcraft Companies, Inc., Norcraft Companies, L.P., as well as a member of the board of managers for that entity’s general partner, Norcraft GP, L.L.C. Mr. Buller’s executive experience in the home furnishings industry is longstanding. From 1988 to 1996, Mr. Buller served in various management positions at Kitchen Craft Cabinets, a Canadian cabinetry maker. From 1996 to 1999, he served as President of Kitchen Craft. Following the acquisition of Kitchen Craft by Omega Cabinets, Ltd., he continued in that position from 1999 to 2000. In 2000, Mr. Buller was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Omega. He remained in that position until 2002, leaving Omega after it was sold to Fortune Brands, Inc. In sum, Mr. Buller has over 26 years in the home furnishings industry, and he spent 18 years as a chief executive officer or division president. Mr. Buller is well-qualified to serve on our Board due to his extensive leadership, executive, managerial, and business experience, particularly in the salient areas of supply chain logistics, product design, brand management, and consumer trends.

Nancy Faginas-Cody has been a director since December 2021. Ms. Faginas-Cody retired from Walt Disney Company as the Senior Vice President, Information Technology Enterprise Business Systems, a position she held from 2013 to 2020. She previously served as Vice President, Information Technology for Disney Consumer Products, Inc. from 2004 to 2013 and as Director, Information Technology for Disney Stores Worldwide from 1999 to 2004.  In her most recent role with Walt Disney Company, she was responsible for the global corporate enterprise business systems. Prior to Walt Disney Company, Ms. Faginas-Cody served in IT leadership roles for retailers such as FEDCO and MacFrugal’s. Ms. Faginas-Cody holds an MBA from the University of California-Irvine and a bachelor’s degree in economics from California State

Table of Contents

University-Fullerton. With more than 40 years of experience in Information Technology, Ms. Faginas-Cody is well-qualified to serve on our Board.

William R. Floyd has been a director since 2016. From 2012 to 2019, Mr. Floyd was a director of Korn/Ferry International, a major executive recruiting firm and talent consultancy, as well as Pivot Physical Therapy, a regional outpatient physical therapy provider. In addition, he served as a business development corporation board member of Muzinich Capital LLC and a broker-dealer affiliated with Muzinich & Co., Inc., a global institutional asset manager specializing in corporate credit from 2016 to 2019. From October 2017 to June 2020, Mr. Floyd served as Chairman of Busaba Restaurants, a U.K. based Thai restaurant concept for which Muzinich is the principal debt holder. From 2009 to 2012, he was Chairman of the Board of Buffet Holdings, Inc., which, through its subsidiaries, owns and operates a chain of restaurants in the United States. Before his retirement as an executive, from 2007 to 2008, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Physiotherapy Associates, a leading provider of outpatient physical rehabilitation services. From 2006 to 2007, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Benchmark Medical, Inc., a predecessor to Physiotherapy Associates. From 2001 to 2006, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Beverly Enterprises, Inc., a leading provider of eldercare services. From 2000 to 2001, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Beverly Enterprises, Inc. From 1996 to 1998, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Hotels International. From 1989 to 1996, he served in various executive positions within PepsiCo Inc.’s restaurant group, including, from 1995 to 1996, as Chief Operating Officer of Taco Bell Corp., and, from 1994 to 1995, as Chief Operating Officer of Kentucky Fried Chicken. Mr. Floyd holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania, and an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where he served as a member of the Board of Overseers of the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing from 2006-2021. Because of his 30-plus years of experience in marketing, management, and operations, as a director, executive, and senior manager in the service industry, with a particular focus on food service, Mr. Floyd is well-qualified to serve on our Board.

Deborah Gonzalez has been a director since December 2021. Ms. Gonzalez brings over 30 years of brand marketing experience to our Board. Ms. Gonzalez currently serves as Senior Vice President, Global Marketing & Communications for Concentrix Corporation, a leading global provider of customer experience solutions and technology, a position she has held since 2020. Previously, Ms. Gonzalez held senior leadership positions in diverse industries, such as Senior Partner for CMO Consulting Group from 2018 to 2020, Chief Brand/Marketing Officer for Massage Envy Franchising from 2014-2018 and various senior leadership roles at PetSmart, Inc. from 2002 to 2014, including Vice President, Merchandising Marketing. Ms. Gonzalez holds an MBA from Thunderbird School of Global Management and a bachelor’s degree in economics from University of San Diego. With Ms. Gonzalez’s specific expertise in delivering marketing programs that help grow demand and loyalty with a focus on customer experience, she is well-qualified to serve on our Board.

Dean C. Kehler has been a director since 2005. In 1998, he co-founded Trimaran Fund, one of our principal investors, where he is a Managing Partner, and serves as a Manager of Trimaran Fund II. Mr. Kehler is also currently the Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GX Acquisition Corp. II, a position he has held since August 2018. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Kehler held senior positions at CIBC, including Vice Chairman of CIBC World Markets Corp. Mr. Kehler currently serves on the Boards of Directors of Portman Ridge Finance Corporation (formerly KCAP Financial Inc.) and Celularity, Inc. Within the last five years, he has served a director of Inviva Inc., Security First Corp. and Graphene Frontiers, LLC. He holds a bachelor's degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Because of his strong background in banking and finance, his many years of experience overseeing this and other corporations, and his knowledge of management and strategy, Mr. Kehler is well-qualified to serve on our Board.

Carol (“Lili”) Lynton has been a director since 2016. In December 2019, Ms. Lynton became a director of Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc., a gaming-focused real estate investment trust, and in September 2019, became a trustee and Chair of the Audit Committee of CIM RACR, an SEC registered interval fund. Since 1992, Ms. Lynton has been an operating partner for The Dinex Group, which operates Daniel Boulud branded restaurants, and which she co-founded. From 2012 to 2019, Ms. Lynton served as director of PR NYC, LLC, a restaurant owner and operator based in New York City. Also, since 1987, Ms. Lynton has served as the chief investment officer of HD American Trust, a family investment office. In 1990, Ms. Lynton co-founded Telebank, an internet banking pioneer sold to E*Trade in 1999. From 1987 to 1990, Ms. Lynton was an investment analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein. From 1983 to 1985, Ms. Lynton was an M&A analyst at Lehman Brothers. Ms. Lynton is an advisory board member for The Hamilton Project; a member of the boards of trustees for East Harlem Scholars Academy, East Harlem Scholars Academy II, and East Harlem Tutorial Program; a board member for The Bail Project; and a board member for the New York City Hospitality Alliance. From 2009 to 2011, Ms. Lynton was a senior vice president with the New York City Investment Fund. Ms. Lynton also holds positions at other

Table of Contents

private or closely held organizations, including Lynton Asset LP, HDA 2015 Trust, and the Lynton Foundation. Ms. Lynton holds a bachelor’s degree from Harvard College and an MBA from Harvard Business School. Ms. Lynton is well-qualified to serve on our Board on account of her extensive experience as a restaurant industry executive and investor.

John M. Roth has been a director since 2007. He has been with Freeman Spogli & Co. (collectively with certain funds managed by it, “Freeman Spogli”), one of our principal investors, since 1988, and has been a General Partner there since 1993, where he now serves as Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since 2016. From 1984 to 1988, Mr. Roth was employed by Kidder, Peabody & Incorporated in the Mergers and Acquisitions Group.  Mr. Roth has served on the board of directors of Arhaus, Inc. and predecessor entities from 2014 to the present. Mr. Roth has served on the board of directors of Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., from 2010 to 2020. From 2005 to 2017, he served on the board of directors of hhgregg, Inc. Mr. Roth received an MBA and a bachelor’s degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. With his extensive experience as a board member of numerous retail and consumer businesses and his experience and insights into strategic expansion opportunities, capital markets, and capitalization strategies, Mr. Roth is well-qualified to serve on our Board.

As stated above, Michael G. Maselli, Chairperson and director, and Dean C. Kehler and John M. Roth, directors, are a Managing Director of Trimaran Fund, a Managing Partner of Trimaran Fund, and a general partner and the Chief Executive Officer of Freeman Spogli, respectively. As described below, our largest stockholder is Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C. ("LLC") and its members include affiliates of Trimaran Fund and Freeman Spogli. Mr. Maselli, Mr. Kehler, and Mr. Roth were selected as directors of the Company pursuant to arrangements among those individuals, LLC., and Trimaran (as defined below) and Freeman Spogli, and pursuant to the limited liability company operating agreement of LLC, as described below under “LLC Agreement.”

There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or person nominated or chosen to become a director or executive officer of the Company, and, except as described in the preceding paragraph with respect to Mr. Maselli, Mr. Kehler, and Mr. Roth, there are no arrangements or understandings between any director or nominee and any other person pursuant to which such individual was or is selected as a director or nominee.

​

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of our Board has appointed BDO USA, LLP, as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. BDO USA, LLP has served in this capacity since 2011.

We ask that you ratify this appointment. Rules of the SEC and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) require our Audit Committee to engage, retain, and supervise our independent registered public accounting firm. However, while stockholder ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP, as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, we think that stockholder ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm is important to stockholders and is a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee may reconsider whether to retain BDO USA, LLP. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

We expect that representatives of BDO USA, LLP will be present at the meeting, that they will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and that they will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Pursuant to our Audit Committee’s charter, our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes, and for overseeing our audits. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, retaining, determining the compensation of, evaluating, and terminating our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is also responsible for establishing and maintaining guidelines for the retention of our independent registered public accounting firm for any non-audit services and for the fees for those services, and for determining procedures to approve audit and non-audit services in advance. Pursuant to our Audit Committee’s Charter, the Audit Committee shall pre-approve any audit or non-audit services provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm as required by applicable laws and listing standards. In addition, the Audit Committee may delegate the pre-approval of permissible non-audit services to one or more of its members, but the decision must be reported to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by BDO USA, LLP during fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2020 in accordance with the foregoing pre-approval policy.

The following table sets forth fees billed by BDO USA, LLP, for the audit of our annual financial statements and other services rendered for the periods presented:

​

​

Table of Contents

You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. This proposal shall be approved if it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP, as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.

​

Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our fiscal 2021 audited financial statements with management.

The Audit Committee has discussed with BDO USA, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from BDO USA, LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding BDO USA, LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and it has discussed with BDO USA, LLP the firm’s independence.

Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that our audited financial statements be included in our annual report on Form 10-K for 2021 for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted,

William R. Floyd

Samuel N. Borgese

Mark Buller

Nancy Faginas-Cody

The foregoing report of the Audit Committee is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this proxy statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing.

​

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Board believes that the Company’s long-term success depends in large measure on the talents of its employees. The Company’s compensation system plays a significant role in its ability to attract, retain and motivate the highest quality workforce. The Board believes that the Company’s current compensation program directly links executive compensation to performance, aligning the interests of the Company’s executive officers with those of its stockholders. The Board endorses the Company’s executive compensation program and encourages stockholders to review the Compensation, Discussion and Analysis, tables and other disclosures included under the Section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation Tables” of this proxy statement.

Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires that the Company periodically submit to the stockholders for an advisory vote a resolution to approve the compensation of its named executive officers ("NEOs") as described in this proxy statement, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution.

The Board recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2022 annual meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosures).”

You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the approval, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, of the compensation of our NEOs. This proposal shall be approved if it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal. This is a non-binding advisory vote and, therefore, its outcome does not mandate any particular action. However, our Board and our Compensation Committee will carefully consider the outcome of this vote when making future decisions regarding the compensation of our NEOs. We will hold our next advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.

​

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

All non-employee directors received both restricted shares and cash compensation. Any directors who are also our employees do not receive compensation for their service as directors. The following table provides compensation information for fiscal 2021 for each of our non-employee directors.

​

Each non-employee director except for the Chairperson of the Board, Mr. Maselli, received an annual grant of 3,419 restricted shares, calculated by dividing the closing price of our stock on May 12, 2021, by $60,000. Mr. Maselli received 6,268 restricted shares, calculated by dividing the closing price of our stock on May 12, 2021, by $110,000. These grants vest ratably based on continued service over three years, and accelerate and fully vest upon a termination of the director’s service by the Company without “cause” or due to the director’s death or “disability.”

In addition, each of our non-employee directors except the Chairperson of the Board, received an annual cash retainer fee of $60,000 in 2021, which was paid quarterly. Mr. Maselli received an annual cash retainer fee of $110,000 in 2021, which was also paid quarterly.

Also, we provided the following annual fees for non-employee directors for committee service, which were paid quarterly:

In addition, on October 3, 2017, the Board appointed a Special Litigation Committee ("SLC") comprised of William R. ("Bill") Floyd and Carol ("Lili") Lynton to investigate and evaluate the allegations and issues raised in derivative litigation brought by a Company stockholder captioned Diep v. Sather, C.A. No. 12760-VCL , pending in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as well as in a demand letter dated September 26, 2017, by purported Company stockholder Fred

Table of Contents

St. John demanding that the Board institute litigation on behalf of the Company relating to similar issues as those in the litigation. On January 11, 2018, Douglas J. Babb was also appointed to serve on the SLC.

The independent directors who serve on the SLC are compensated $4,000 per month for those months in which the SLC is working in earnest and its members are fully engaged. In 2021, each member of the SLC received $48,000 in compensation for service on that committee.

​

GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY

Board Composition

Our certificate of incorporation provides that the number of directors on our Board is to be fixed exclusively pursuant to Board resolution. The exact size of our Board shall be determined from time to time by the Board. Our Board currently consists of eleven directors.

Our Board is divided into three classes as set forth below, with each director serving a three-year term and with one class to be elected at each year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

​

We are a party to a stockholders’ agreement with the LLC, whose members are investment funds managed by affiliates of Trimaran Capital Partners (with its predecessors and affiliates and certain funds managed by it, collectively, “Trimaran”) and Freeman Spogli, certain members of our management, and other third-party investors. The stockholders’ agreement provides certain rights to LLC, including registration rights for common stock owned by LLC. The limited liability company operating agreement of LLC also provides rights to Trimaran and Freeman Spogli, including certain registration rights. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions - Stockholders Agreement” for additional information.

​

Table of Contents

Board Diversity

We are committed to creating a diverse and inclusive culture and have furthered these efforts by focusing on increasing diversity, both within our management team as well as on the Board of Directors. To that end, we added two diverse women to the Board in 2021.

​

Board Leadership Structure

Separate individuals serve as our Chairperson and our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Roberts currently serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Maselli currently serves as the Chairperson of the Board. We do not have a policy requiring the separation of these positions. Rather, as our corporate governance guidelines explain, the Board is free to choose its Chairperson in any way that it deems best for the Company at any given point in time. Under the circumstances, we currently believe that this separation is appropriate given that it allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on operational and day-to-day issues and our Chairperson to focus on oversight and long-term strategy. Given our growing business, and the daily operational demands and complexities thereof, we believe that this division of labor helps our Chief Executive Officer’s focus and productivity. In parallel, given the growing complexity of our business and the increased burdens on our Board, we believe that this division of labor helps our Chairperson and our Board to remain focused on their respective core responsibilities and competencies, and provides a greater role for non-management director participation than would be the case if the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer positions were combined.

In addition, Mr. Borgese was appointed as our Lead Independent Director in January 2022.

Among others, the Lead Independent Director’s duties and responsibilities include:

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, executive officers, and employees, available at http://investor.elpolloloco.com/corporate-governance. We expect that any amendments to the code, or any waivers thereto granted to a director or executive officer requiring disclosure under applicable SEC or Nasdaq rules, will be posted on our website.

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines to assist it in the exercise of its fiduciary duties and responsibilities to us and to promote the effective functioning of the Board and its committees. Our corporate governance guidelines cover, among other topics:

Our corporate governance guidelines are available on our website, at http://investor.elpolloloco.com/corporate-governance. We expect that any amendments to the guidelines will be disclosed on our website.

Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees a company-wide approach to risk management that is carried out by management, which is designed to enhance stockholder value, support the achievement of strategic objectives and improve long-term organizational performance. The Board determines the appropriate risk levels for the Company generally, assesses the specific risks faced by the Company, and reviews the steps taken by management to manage those risks. The Board’s involvement in setting the Company’s business strategy facilitates these assessments and reviews, culminating in the development of a strategy that reflects both the Board’s and management’s consensus as to appropriate levels of risk and the appropriate measures to manage those risks. Pursuant to this structure, risk is assessed throughout the enterprise, focusing on risks arising out of various aspects of the Company’s strategy and the implementation of that strategy, including financial, legal/compliance, operational/strategic, health and safety, and compensation risks. The Board also considers risk when evaluating proposed transactions and other matters presented to the Board, including acquisitions and financial matters.

While the Board maintains ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, its committees oversee risk in specific areas. Our Audit Committee oversees management of risks involving accounting and financial reporting, including internal controls. In addition, the Audit Committee oversees the Company’s compliance program with respect to legal and regulatory requirements, including the Company’s codes of conduct and policies and procedures for monitoring compliance. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports on the Company’s cybersecurity compliance and risk management practices.

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews compensation practices and policies to determine whether they encourage excessive risk taking, including an annual review of management’s assessment of the risk associated with the Company’s compensation programs covering its employees, including executives. The Compensation Committee also has responsibilities regarding risk related to succession planning. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees management of risks associated with corporate governance and conflicts of interest. At the Board’s instruction, management regularly reports on applicable risks to the Board or to a relevant committee, with additional review or reporting on risks conducted as needed or as requested by the Board and by its committees.

Our Board believes that the process it has established to administer the Board’s risk oversight function would be effective under a variety of leadership frameworks and, therefore, does not have a material effect on our choice of the Board’s leadership structure described above under “Board Leadership Structure.”

Table of Contents

Oversight of Information Security Risk

Our Chief Privacy Officer, who is also our Vice President of Information Technology, oversees our information security program. Our Board and the Audit Committee receive regular reports on the Company’s cybersecurity and other information technology risks. Management reports quarterly to the Audit Committee regarding information security. We consider each member of our Audit Committee to possess information security experience by way of their oversight responsibilities over this area. In providing such oversight, the Audit Committee may also discuss such processes and controls with our internal and independent registered public accounting firm.

We identify and address information security risks by employing a defense-in-depth methodology that provides multiple, redundant defensive measures in case a security control fails, or a vulnerability is exploited. We leverage internal resources, along with strategic external partnerships, to mitigate cybersecurity threats to the Company. We deploy both commercially available solutions and proprietary systems to manage threats to our information technology environment actively. We employ a robust information security and training program for our employees, including mandatory computer-based training, regular internal communications, and ongoing end-user testing to measure the effectiveness of our information security program. We are externally audited and certified by top information security standards, specifically for the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), to ensure we comply with this rigorous standard and as part of our Sarbanes Oxley audit process. We regularly engage appropriate external resources regarding emerging threats to navigate the diverse cybersecurity landscape. We maintain cybersecurity insurance.

Director Independence

Under the applicable listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq, independent directors must comprise a majority of our Board, subject to certain specified exceptions. In addition, applicable Nasdaq rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees must be independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq rules. Audit Committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. The Board has reviewed the independence of our directors under the applicable rules of Nasdaq. Based on this review, the Board determined that each of Messrs. Babb, Borgese, Buller, Floyd, Roth and Mses. Lynton, Faginas-Cody and Gonzales are independent under the applicable listing standards of Nasdaq. In making this determination, our Board considered its relationship and other related transactions with each of these non-employee directors (as more fully described in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” pages 49 to 52 herein) and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock held by each non-employee director. Mr. Roberts is not an independent director due to serving as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer. Our Board previously determined that Mr. Bernard Acoca was not independent during his service on our Board through October 2021 due to his position as our Chief Executive Officer and President.

As required under applicable Nasdaq rules, we anticipate that our independent directors will meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present. Our independent directors held executive sessions four times in 2021 in conjunction with our Board meetings.

Board Committees

Our Board has established standing committees in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities. These committees include an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members are independent, under applicable Nasdaq listing standards. Our Board has adopted written charters for each of these committees, current copies of which are available at http://investor.elpolloloco.com/corporate-governance. Our Board may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.

​

Table of Contents

​

The composition of each of our three standing committees is set forth below:

​

C = Chairperson

​

Audit Committee

The functions of the Audit Committee, among other things, include:

Our Board has determined that Mr. Floyd qualifies as an “Audit Committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Additionally, our Board has determined that Messrs. Floyd, Borgese and Buller and Ms. Faginas-Cody each qualifies as independent as independence for Audit Committee members is defined under Nasdaq listing standards, and under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.

Compensation Committee

The functions of the Compensation Committee, among other things, include:

Table of Contents

In order to comply with certain SEC requirements, the committee (or a subcommittee thereof) must consist of at least two directors that qualify as “non-employee directors” for the purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that Messrs. Buller and Babb, and Mses. Lynton and Gonzalez each qualifies as a “non-employee director.”

Human Capital Oversight

In overseeing our human capital programs, the committee works with management to foster a work environment that includes and embraces a diversity of backgrounds and perspectives. The Company has focused on increasing diversity and has made great progress towards this goal, including within its leadership team and operational management. For example, as of the end of fiscal year 2021, approximately:

Management regularly reports to the committee regarding team member development, health and wellness benefits and programs, special incentives and recognition programs, 401(k) plans, flexible work schedules, and any other programs designed to meet the needs of our team members and their families. Management also regularly reviews with the committee retention and engagement of team members, including providing results and analysis from the engagement survey provided to all team members in 2021, which gave team members the opportunity to share their opinions and feedback on our culture.

Executive and Director Compensation

Our processes and procedures for considering and determining executive and director compensation begin with the compensation guidelines in our corporate governance guidelines, which are developed and reviewed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and approved by the Board. These guidelines state that directors who are also Company officers are not to receive additional compensation for director service, and that compensation for non-employee directors should be competitive and encourage stock ownership through payment of a portion of compensation in the form of stock, options, or similar securities. Our guidelines also task the Compensation Committee with periodically reviewing the level and form of director compensation, including compared to companies of similar size, industry, and complexity, with changes to director compensation to be proposed to the full Board for consideration. Moreover, regarding delegation of authority, under its charter, the committee may form subcommittees for any purpose that the committee deems appropriate and may delegate to such subcommittees such power and authority as the committee deems appropriate;

Table of Contents

provided, however, that the committee shall not delegate to a subcommittee any power or authority required by any law, regulation, or listing standard to be exercised by the committee as a whole.

In particular, the committee may delegate the approval of award grants and other transactions and responsibilities regarding the administration of compensatory programs to a subcommittee consisting solely of members of the committee who are “non-employee directors” for the purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act.

In addition, the committee may delegate to one or more of our officers the authority to make grants and awards of stock rights or options to any non-section 16 officer of the Company under such of our incentive-compensation or other equity-based plans as the committee deems appropriate and in accordance with the terms of such plans.

Engagement of Consultants and Advisors

Under its charter, our committee may conduct or authorize investigations into or studies of matters within its scope of responsibilities and may retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel, or other advisor in its sole discretion. The committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of any compensation consultant, legal counsel, or other advisor that it retains. The Company bears all expenses. The committee may select, or receive advice from, a compensation consultant, legal counsel, or other advisor to the committee, other than in-house legal counsel, only after conducting an assessment of, and determining, the advisor’s independence, including whether the advisor’s work has raised any questions of independence or conflicts of interest, taking into consideration the Exchange Act, the factors set forth in the rules of the Nasdaq, and any other factors that the committee deems relevant.

In 2021, the committee engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (the “compensation consultant”), to advise the committee on an ongoing basis as an independent compensation consultant. The compensation consultant reports directly to the committee. While conducting assignments, the compensation consultant interacts with our management when appropriate. Specifically, our Vice President, Chief People Officer and Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, worked with the compensation consultant to provide information regarding the Company and its executive compensation policies and practices. In addition, the compensation consultant may seek feedback from the committee chairperson and other Board members regarding its work before presenting study results or recommendations to the committee. The compensation consultant may be invited to attend committee meetings. The committee determines when to hire, terminate, or replace the compensation consultant, and the projects to be performed by the compensation consultant. In 2021, as in prior years, the committee requested the compensation consultant to assist in review of Board compensation and executive compensation review and benchmarking against the Company’s peers. Except as described in this paragraph, the compensation consultant did not perform any other services to the Company or its management during fiscal 2021.

After review and consultation with the compensation consultant, the committee determined that there was no conflict of interest resulting from retaining the consultant in fiscal 2021. The committee is retaining the compensation consultant to advise the committee on certain compensation matters in 2022, but under its charter the committee has the discretion to retain, or not to retain, compensation consultants and other advisors in its sole discretion.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for identifying and evaluating nominees for director, among other things, include:

Table of Contents

As discussed above in the Q&A, the committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. The committee does not have any specific requirements for candidates and nominees, but is tasked by its charter to consider:

As a practical matter, the committee seeks candidates who contribute complimentary and relevant strengths, including diverse perspectives, diverse personal backgrounds, and diverse professional backgrounds encompassing retail, real estate, management, operations, finance, accounting, marketing, and law.

Similarly, under its corporate governance guidelines, the Board in evaluating nominees may apply all criteria it deems appropriate, including:

As indicated, diversity in its many forms is important to the committee and to the Board in director selection as part of the holistic process of candidate and nominee evaluation. The committee’s responsibilities under its charter include (i) reviewing annually with the Board the composition of the Board as a whole and recommending, if necessary, measures to be taken so that the Board reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity required for the Board as a whole, and (ii) annually evaluating the committee’s performance. Similarly, the Board is tasked under its corporate governance guidelines with conducting annual self-assessments of the performance of the Board and of each of its committees, the results of which will be discussed with the full Board and with each committee, including reviews of any areas where Board members or management believe that the Board can better contribute to the Company.

Table of Contents

The Board will use the results to determine the characteristics and skills required of prospective Board members and for committee assignments. Therefore, at both the committee and at the Board level, feedback mechanisms help assessment of diversity, recruitment, and other policies.

ESG Governance & Leadership

The core of who we are as a brand is built on a foundation of the highest integrity and an uncompromised standard of ethics. We strive to create a culture of heart-centered leadership, accountability, open and authentic communication, inclusivity, and strong values with our team members, guests, and partners. ESG oversight is conducted from the highest levels of our organization. Our Board of Directors oversees our ESG and sustainability strategy, initiatives, and policies, including management’s assessment of these strategies, initiatives and policies, with assistance of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee in their relative areas of expertise. At the management level, ESG oversight is provided by our Chief Executive Officer and our ESG Steering Committee, which supports our ongoing commitment to social responsibility, sustainability, and the integration of ESG into our business. The ESG Steering Committee is made up of subject-matter experts in relevant disciplines across our organization such as human resources, operations, development, supply chain, investor relations, and legal and government affairs.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2021, Compensation Committee members included Douglas J. Babb, Mark Buller and Carol (“Lili”) Lynton. None of these individuals during that year or otherwise formerly was our officer or employee or had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of our executive officers serves or has served as a member of the board of directors, compensation committee, or other board committee performing equivalent functions, of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as one of our directors or on our Compensation Committee.

Board Meetings

The Board held 10 meetings or special meetings in 2021. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of board and committee meetings held in 2021 while that director served on the board and on those committees.

This behavior is in accordance with our corporate governance guidelines, which state that directors are expected to spend the time and effort necessary to properly discharge their responsibilities, by regularly attending Board and committee meetings, and by reviewing, prior to meetings, material distributed in advance for those meetings.

Annual Meeting Attendance

Pursuant to our corporate governance guidelines, directors are expected to attend our annual meeting of stockholders, and a director who is unable to attend, which it is understood will occur on occasion, is expected to notify our Chairperson. In 2021, all nine directors then on the Board attended our annual meeting.

Succession Planning

The Board, led by the Compensation Committee, plans for Chief Executive Officer succession. To assist the Board and the Compensation Committee, the Chief Executive Officer prepares and distributes to the Compensation Committee an annual assessment of each officer’s performance and his or her ability to succeed the Chief Executive Officer or another senior officer, which assessments are used for succession planning purposes. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer prepares and maintains a short-term succession plan delineating temporary delegations of authority in the event that one or more senior officers unexpectedly become unavailable or incapacitated. This short-term succession plan is approved by the Board and effective in an emergency unless and until the Board takes other action.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Executive Officers

In addition to Laurance Roberts, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Interim Chief Financial Officer, whose biography is included under the heading “Director Biographies,” our other executive officer as of April 28, 2022, is as follows:

Miguel Lozano was appointed as our Chief Operating Officer on April 1, 2019.  Before joining the Company, Mr. Lozano, spent twenty-three years at Starbucks in various capacities, most recently as Regional Vice President of Operations for Los Angeles, Central, and Coastal California from 2011 to April 2019.  Prior to that he served as Director of Operations, from 1996 to 2011, leading stores in the Orange County, California area, as well as Director of Business Systems Transformation from 2005 to 2009.  Mr. Lozano also held positions with Carlton Restaurants Worldwide and began his career as a Restaurant General Manager and Area Leader with the Company.

​

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") provides an overview of our overall executive compensation program, including the philosophy and goals, main components of pay and the decision-making process with respect to each of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) for 2021. We believe our compensation programs reflect our commitment to adhere to best practices and only reward positive performance.

For 2021 our NEOs were:

​

Executive Summary

Fiscal 2021 - Year in Review

Our financial results for fiscal 2021 demonstrate the overall strength and resilience of our brand in the market. Despite the increased costs and staffing challenges resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic, our financial results showed a significant improvement compared to both fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019.

Through this significant time of change, we led with the pillars of our Transformation Agenda. We continue to focus on differentiating our brand through our LA-Mex positioning and investments in our loyalty, delivery and social media platforms. Additionally, throughout the pandemic, we focused on our greatest asset, our team members, through our people-first culture. We brought new programs and benefits, including special incentives and recognition programs, to our team members to support them during this difficult time. We continued our efforts to simplify operations to further enhance the work environment in our restaurants, which will enable our team members to provide an exceptional experience for our customers.

Table of Contents

As a result of the transformation agenda and additional Company strategies, we achieved:

Overall Compensation Philosophy

We believe our compensation programs serve three primary purposes.

​

Table of Contents

We believe these practices, along with our pay-for-performance philosophy, combine to create a compensation program aligned with the interests of our stockholders.

Elements of Executive Compensation

The following table provides information regarding the elements of our executive compensation program.

​

Stockholder Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation

In 2021, stockholders voted on the compensation of our NEOs (this vote is commonly referred to as a “say on pay” vote).  At our 2021 annual meeting, approximately 98% of the votes cast supported our say-on-pay proposal. The Compensation Committee believes this high degree of stockholder support for our 2021 say-on-pay proposal, together with a similarly high level of stockholder support for our inaugural say-on-pay proposal in 2020, affirms stockholders’ support of our executive compensation program.

We will have our third say on pay vote this year and going forward annually, so that our stockholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee intends to consider the outcome of stockholders votes on our executive compensation program when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs.

​

Table of Contents

Our Executive Compensation Process

​

Use of Quantitative and Qualitative Measurements. We believe compensation should be based on factors that can be objectively determined, such as how well we have attained our earnings goals. For 2021, our Annual Incentive Plan awards were determined based 60% on our adjusted EBITDA and 40% on our revenue achieved against target goals for the year. In addition, the Compensation Committee may adjust the payout under the Annual Incentive Plan from 0% to 140% of the amount attributable to the Company performance metrics based on an individual performance factor. This individual performance factor is assessed based on an individual’s contribution to the Company’s objectives.

Market Data. As part of the annual executive compensation process, the Compensation Committee reviews compensation levels, practices, and pay of executives serving in comparable positions at peer group companies. In 2021, both peer group proxy data and industry-comparative compensation surveys were reviewed.

The Compensation Committee reviews the composition of the peer group on an annual basis in consultation with its independent compensation consultant. In selecting our peer group, we focus on similar companies in terms of industry, size and business characteristics.

​

Table of Contents

Our Compensation Committee compared our compensation with that of the following companies considered as a group (collectively the “Peer Group”):

​

Named Executive Officer Compensation

Compensation to our named executive officers consists of four elements: base salary, annual cash incentive awards, long-term incentive awards, and “other” compensation items (including perquisites, benefits and severance).

Distribution of Compensation

We weight a greater proportion of total compensation toward performance-based components such as annual cash incentive awards, which can increase or decrease to reflect changes in corporate and individual performance on an annual basis, and long-term compensation, which can reinforce management’s commitment to enhancing profitability and stockholder value over the long-term.

A significant percentage of named executive officers’ total direct compensation is variable based on performance factors (including our share price, in the case of long-term incentive awards). We believe this type of variable compensation supports our pay-for-performance philosophy. For 2021, 70% of Mr. Robert’s total direct compensation as Chief Executive Officer was variable, based on performance factors, and for all named executive officers as a group, between 67-75% of their total direct compensation as named executive officers was variable, based on performance factors.

Base Salary

Base salaries are intended to provide a base level of compensation and are paid in recognition of the skills, experience, and business contribution of our named executive officers. Salaries for our named executive officers are reviewed on an annual basis. In setting base salary, we consider the performance of the named executive officer, Company performance, tenure of the named executive officer, prior changes to the named executive officer’s compensation, internal equity, and

Table of Contents

external benchmarking of similarly situated executives in our Peer Group described above. For newly hired executives, we also consider the level of compensation necessary to attract the executive to the Company.

The Compensation Committee determined to increase each named executive officer’s base salary for 2021 based on its assessment of each executive’s performance in 2020. The base salaries for each of the NEOs during fiscal 2021 and 2020 are set forth below.

​

In connection with Mr. Roberts’ appointment as our Interim Chief Executive Officer on October 15, 2021, his base salary was increased by $105,000, so that his base salary was $502,924 at the end of 2021. In connection with Mr. Roberts’ appointment as our Chief Executive Officer and President on March 9, 2022, his base salary was increased to $600,000.

​

Annual Incentive Plan

Our named executive officers participate in an annual cash incentive plan which provides them an opportunity to earn a cash award based on the attainment of certain pre-determined goals of the Company. For 2021 these goals were based on: (i) adjusted EBITDA, and (ii) revenue comprised of company sales and franchisee royalty income. Payouts based on the attainment of these performance goals may range from 0% to 180% of the target award. Payouts are also subject to an individual performance factor (“IPF”). The individual performance factor can adjust the achievement of the Company performance metrics range from 0% to 140% of the amount attributable to the Company performance metric. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) filed on March 11, 2022, for more details on how our adjusted EBITDA is calculated.

Goals are established by the Board in the first quarter of the applicable fiscal year and range from a minimum (or threshold) level to a maximum level, with a target level in between. Each named executive officer has a targeted award potential expressed as a percentage of salary. Notwithstanding such targets, our Board has discretion to reduce the size of any award if it believes the interests of our stockholders would be better served thereby.

For fiscal year 2021, our named executive officers’ target Annual Incentive Plan award (as a percentage of their base salary) were as follows:

​

Mr. Roberts’ target Annual Incentive Plan award was originally set at 75% of his base salary for 2021. However, in connection with his appointment as our Interim Chief Executive Officer on October 15, 2021, his target Annual Incentive Plan award was increased to 100% of his base salary for the portion of the year following his appointment (so that Mr. Roberts’ target award was 75% of his base salary up until October 15, 2021 and 100% of his base salary thereafter). Mr. Acoca was originally awarded a target Annual Incentive Plan award equal to 100% of his base salary, however he forfeited his award opportunity and was not paid any bonus award for 2021 because of his resignation. The remainder of this section discusses the determination of the Annual Incentive Plan awards for Messrs. Roberts and Lozano.

Table of Contents

​

For fiscal year 2021, the threshold, target and maximum Company Annual Incentive Plan targets were weighted at 60% for achievement of EBITDA targets and at 40% for revenue based on the following performance target amounts, and the Company’s actual results.

The Annual Incentive Plan percentage payout for Company performance are as follows:

​

* The Company achieved 100% of the adjusted EBITDA target and 70.1% of the revenue target. The incentive plan allows for a payout of 100% for both revenue and EBITDA within a range of performance. In addition, certain non-recurring and other costs not accounted for when determining the targets were added back into actual and/or target EBITDA and revenue used in the calculation of the incentive payout percentage. The 92.7% payout percentage is calculated after giving effect to an increase in the size of the Company’s 2021 annual bonus pool for all participating employees that was approved by the Compensation Committee.

The Annual Incentive Plan payout achieved by each NEO based on the Company’s performance, the adjustment for an individual performance factor (“IPF”) for each NEO, and the actual 2021 Annual Incentive Plan payout received by each NEO are set forth in the table below.

​

Long-Term Incentive Awards

We provide long-term incentive compensation to our named executive officers pursuant to our 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Incentive Plan”). We believe that long-term incentive awards help to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders, motivate them to create value in the Company over a longer term than annual cash incentive awards, and encourage our named executive officers to avoid taking excessive risks. We have previously granted

Table of Contents

four types of long-term incentive awards applicable to our named executive officers: restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock option awards, and in the case of Mr. Acoca, performance-based restricted stock awards.

In determining the aggregate amount of long-term incentive awards to grant each named executive officer, we consider the individual’s performance, the expense recognized by the Company for equity grants, the potential dilutive effect equity grants may have on existing stockholders, the number of shares available for grant in our 2021 Incentive Plan, comparisons to our Peer Group and the accumulated wealth prior equity awards have created. In considering which type of equity grant to make our named executive officers, we consider the motivational effect each award will have. While stock options motivate our named executive officers by providing potential gain if our stock price increases, our stock awards, both time-based and performance-based, more directly expose our named executive officers to the effects of a decrease in our stock price. For 2021, we determined to structure our annual equity awards so that the grant date value of the equity awards granted to the named executive officers consisted of an approximately equally weighted mix of restricted share awards and stock options.

Restricted Share and Option Awards

All restricted shares and stock options generally vest in four equal annual installments commencing on the one-year anniversary of grant. During the period while the restricted shares remain unvested, the grantees have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the restricted shares except the right to transfer the restricted shares (including the right to vote restricted shares and to receive ordinary dividends paid to or made with respect to the restricted shares, if any). The grantees have no stockholder rights with respect to their stock option awards until the options are actually exercised.

In fiscal year 2021, the Board granted restricted shares and stock options to our named executive officers as follows:

The aggregate amount of the 2021 long-term incentive awards granted to each named executive officer was determined by our Compensation Committee based on the factors described above.

The table above includes an additional award of restricted shares having a grant date value of approximately $200,000 that was granted to Mr. Roberts in connection with his appointment as our Interim Chief Executive Officer.  These restricted shares will become vested on the one-year anniversary of Mr. Roberts’ appointment as our Interim Chief Executive Officer and will also vest if his is employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Roberts for good reason.  These restricted shares were a one-time award made to Mr. Roberts as a retention incentive and to provide an additional compensation opportunity for his role as Interim Chief Executive Officer.

Other Compensation

Perquisites & Benefits. In fiscal 2021, we provided our named executive officers certain perquisites and benefits, generally at the same level and offering made available to other employees, including our 401(k) Plan, health care plans, life insurance plans, and other welfare benefit programs. In addition, each of our named executive officers was entitled to an automobile allowance and fuel costs. Each named executive officer also received supplemental disability insurance coverage and reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket medical expenses.

The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan that permits its employees, subject to certain eligibility requirements, to contribute up to 25% of their qualified compensation to the plan. The Company matches 100% of the employees’ contributions of

Table of Contents

the first 3% of the employees’ annual qualified compensation, and 50% of the employees’ contributions of the next 2% of the employees’ annual qualified compensation. The Company’s matching contribution immediately fully vests.

Sign-on Bonuses, New Hire Equity Awards and Relocation Payments. The Company occasionally provides sign-on bonuses, new hire equity awards, and relocation payments when the Compensation Committee determines it necessary and appropriate to attract top executive talent. These awards are utilized to help offset compensation an executive forfeits from their previous company to join the Company. We typically require the newly hired executive to return the full award amount of any sign-on bonuses and relocation payments if they voluntarily leave the Company within a certain period of time after hire and new hire equity awards are subject to a time-based vesting period.

Other Compensation Policies

Policy on Hedging and Pledging Transactions

We do not permit any director, employee or officer of the Company to engage in short sales, transactions in put or call options, hedging transactions or other similar transactions designed to allow an individual to “lock in” appreciation in value or hold securities of the Company without the full risks and rewards of ownership. In addition, no director, employee or officer of the Company may margin, or make any offer to margin, any of the Company’s stock, or pledge any Company stock, subject to a limited exception applicable to pledges that requires Company pre-approval.

Description of Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers.  Each of the employment agreements provides for an initial term ranging from one year to eighteen months, and automatically renews for an additional one-year term, unless either party provides 60 days’ notice prior to the end of the term. We have also entered into indemnification agreements with each of our named executive officers.

Bernard Acoca

In connection with his appointment as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer in 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Bernard Acoca. Following Mr. Acoca’s resignation on October 15, 2021, he no longer remains employed pursuant to the employment agreement, but does remain subject to the restrictive covenants contained in his employment agreement (which include an indefinite confidentiality covenant and 12-month post-termination covenants relating to non-interference with the Company’s business relationships and non-solicitation of the Company’s employees and consultants).

In connection with Mr. Acoca’s resignation, we entered into a Consulting Agreement with him that is described in more detail later in this proxy statement

Laurance Roberts

We entered into an employment agreement in 2013 with Mr. Roberts. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Roberts will receive a salary equal to $300,000, which may be increased in our sole discretion, will receive a $600 per month transportation allowance, will be eligible to earn annual cash incentive awards with a target of 75% of his then current base salary, will be eligible to participate in the Company’s equity-based compensation plan, and will be entitled to certain other benefits and perquisites as more fully described above in the “Perquisites & Benefits” section. Mr. Roberts’ employment with us may be terminated at any time by either party, provided that Mr. Roberts is required to provide us with 90-day advance notice in case of resignation. If we terminate Mr. Roberts’ employment without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in Mr. Roberts’ employment agreement) and provided that he signs a general release of claims, Mr. Roberts will be entitled to continuation of base salary for 12 months following termination of employment. In addition, in case of any termination of employment, except termination by us for cause or voluntary resignation by Mr. Roberts without good reason, Mr. Roberts will be entitled to a Pro-Rata Annual Cash Incentive for the year of termination based on our actual performance. Mr. Roberts’ employment agreement contains an indefinite confidentiality covenant and 12-month post-termination covenants relating to non-interference with the Company’s business relationships and non-solicitation of the Company’s employees and consultants.

Table of Contents

On October 15, 2021, we entered into a letter amendment to his employment agreement for his new position as interim Chief Executive Officer (the “Interim CEO Agreement”). Pursuant to the Interim CEO Agreement, Mr. Roberts’ annual base salary was increased by $105,000 and his target annual bonus was increased from 75% to 100% of base salary during his tenure as Interim CEO. In addition, he became entitled to receive the grant of restricted shares described above. Except as otherwise modified by the Interim CEO Agreement, the terms and conditions of Mr. Roberts’ existing employment agreement remained in effect.

​

The Interim CEO Agreement terminated on March 9, 2022, when he entered into a new employment agreement in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, President and a Class III director on the Board of Directors of the Company. Pursuant to the employment agreement, the term of Mr. Roberts’ employment as Chief Executive Officer and President will end on the 12^th month anniversary of the effective date and on such date and on each subsequent anniversary of such time, the term shall, without further action by Mr. Roberts or the Company, be extended by an additional one-year period, subject to earlier termination as provided in the employment agreement. Mr. Roberts’ annual base salary under the employment agreement will be $600,000 and his target annual bonus will be 100% of his base salary during his tenure as Chief Executive Officer. In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement and at the discretion of our Board of Directors, during the term of the employment agreement, starting in April 2022, Mr. Roberts will be eligible to receive an annual discretionary equity grant, with the amount and terms thereof determined by the Board of Directors. During the term of the Employment Agreement, Mr. Roberts will be entitled to employee benefits on the same basis as those generally available to other senior executives. Mr. Roberts will also be entitled to at least four weeks of vacation per year and an automobile allowance substantially similar to that provided to other similarly situated senior executives.

The employment agreement provides that in the event that Mr. Roberts’ employment is terminated due to death or disability he will be entitled to a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance. The employment agreement also provides that in the event that Mr. Roberts’ employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, then he will be entitled to receive a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance and continuation of payment of base salary for twelve months, subject, in each case, to the execution of a general release and compliance with applicable restrictive covenants.

The employment agreement contains a perpetual confidentiality covenant, a one-year post-termination non-interference covenant applicable to the Company’s relationships with suppliers, customers and partners and a one-year post-termination non-solicitation covenant applicable to Company employees.

Miguel Lozano

In 2019, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lozano. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Lozano will receive a salary equal to $325,000, which may be increased at the sole discretion of the Board, will be eligible to earn annual cash incentive awards with a target of 75% of his then current base salary, will be eligible to participate in the Company’s equity-based compensation plan and will be entitled to certain other benefits and perquisites as more fully described above in the “Perquisites & Benefits” section.  Mr. Lozano’s employment with us may be terminated at any time by either party, provided that Mr. Lozano is required to provide us with 90-day advance notice in case of resignation. The employment agreement provides that in the event that Mr. Lozano’s employment is terminated due to death or disability he will be entitled to a Pro-Rata Annual Cash Incentive for the year of termination based on actual performance. If we terminate Mr. Lozano’s employment without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in Mr. Lozano’s employment agreement), Mr. Lozano will be entitled to the Pro-Rata Annual Cash Incentive and continuation of base salary for 12 months following termination of employment provided that he signs a general release of claims. Mr. Lozano’s employment agreement contains an indefinite confidentiality covenant and 12-month post-termination covenants relating to non-interference with the Company’s business relationships and non-solicitation of the Company’s employees and consultants.

Change in Control Provisions in Equity Awards

The 2021 Incentive Plan provides that, except as otherwise provided in an award agreement, if a “change in control” of the Company occurs (as such term is defined in the 2021 Incentive Plan) and the award holder’s employment or service is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by the award holder for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the 2021 Incentive Plan) within 12 months following the change in control, then the outstanding and unvested equity awards will fully vest (with any performance conditions deemed to be achieved at target performance levels). The Compensation

Table of Contents

Committee, which administers the 2021 Incentive Plan, may also provide for the acceleration of outstanding and unvested equity awards upon a change in control of the Company.

Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to Risk Management

In 2021, our Compensation Committee reviewed our compensation policies and practices and concluded that the mix and design of these policies and practices are not reasonably likely to encourage our employees to take excessive risks. In connection with its evaluation, our Compensation Committee considered, among other things, the structure, philosophy and design characteristics of our primary incentive compensation plans and programs in light of our risk management and governance procedures, as well as other factors that may calibrate or balance potential risk-taking incentives. Based on this assessment, our Compensation Committee concluded that risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers, are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Tax Considerations

Prior to its amendment by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Legislation”), which was enacted December 22, 2017, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code disallowed a tax deduction to public companies for compensation paid in excess of $1 million to “covered employees” (generally, such company's chief executive officer and its three other highest paid executive officers other than its chief financial officer). Prior to the Tax Legislation, there was an exception to this $1 million limitation for performance-based compensation if certain requirements were met.

The Tax Legislation generally amended Section 162(m) to eliminate the exception for performance-based compensation. The $1 million compensation limit was also expanded to apply to a public company's chief financial officer and apply to certain individuals who were covered employees in years other than the then-current taxable year. The Tax Legislation provides for “grandfathering” of awards in effect as of November 2, 2017, if certain conditions are met, including lack of modification of the terms of the awards. As in prior years the Company will continue to consider the tax and accounting implications (including with respect to the expected lack of deductibility under the revised Section 162(m)) when making compensation decisions, but it reserves its right to continue to make compensation decisions based on other factors if it determines that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to do so. Further, the Company may determine to make changes or amendments to the Company's existing compensation programs in order to revise aspects of our executive compensation programs that were initially designed to comply with Section 162(m) but that may no longer serve as an appropriate incentive measure for our executive officers.

​

​

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed our Compensation Discussion and Analysis section with management and, based on the review and discussions, recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section be included in this proxy statement on Schedule 14A.

Compensation Committee

Douglas Babb

Mark Buller

Carol (“Lili”) Lynton

Deborah Gonzalez

​

The foregoing report of the Compensation Committee is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this proxy statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing.

​

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

2021 Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation for 2021, 2020 and 2019 awarded to, earned by or paid to our NEOs.

​

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth outstanding equity awards as of December 29, 2021. For more information on the equity awards granted in fiscal 2021, see the “Named Executive Officer Compensation - Long-Term Incentive Awards” section above.

​

​

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-based Awards Table

The following table summarizes information regarding grants of plan-based awards for the NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 29, 2021.